JUAN XU 庸现

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • PROJECTS
    • Bald Girls Iberia Center 2012
    • Bald Girls A Door 2013
    • Made in China 2013
    • Beuys in China 2013
    • Bald Girls Timelag 2013
    • Femme Totale 2014
    • Bald Girls meet Fluxus 2014
    • Bald Girls Pink Solution 2014
    • Bald Girls Nanjing Forum 2014
    • Fluxus Nanjing 2014
    • Li Xinmo Excluded 2015
    • Performance Day 2015
    • Performance Day 2016
    • Performance Day 2017
    • Art Tour Live Tour 3 / Join us to Kassel 2017
    • Feminist Activism in China: In Conversation with Li Maizi 2017
    • Tianjin Live Art Exhibition 2018
    • Denn ich habe schon alles schon gesehen Frankfurt 2018
    • Performance Day Frankfurt 2018
    • Capital @Art. International Frankfurt 2018
    • Feelings as Facts - Memory as Identity Tianjin China 2018-2019
    • Spectacle International Art Exchange Jiangxi China 2019
    • The 7th UP-ON International Live Art Festival 2019
    • 0 Edge Shift Europe A 2020
    • Sharing Crisis 2020
  • ARTICLES
    • Sharing Crisis
    • A Very Serious Game
    • Bald Girls
    • Who is Mary Bauermeister?
    • Iberia Art Center
    • Time Travel to Fluxus
    • Memory as Iidentity
    • We are the Revolution
    • Capital in the Digital Age @ Art
    • Money Is Time
    • Operation Thanatos in Action
    • Memory as Identity
    • From Political Critique to Spiritual Embrace
    • Perception is Reality
    • At Least the Pain is Real
  • PRESS
    • New York Times
    • F.A.Z.
    • Global Times
    • ML Art Source
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • Catalogue Bald Girls
    • Introduction
    • Declaration
    • Preface
    • Li Xinmo
    • Xiao Lu
    • Lan Jiny
    • Female Performance Art
    • History of Feminism
    • Feminist Movement and Feminist Art in East and West
  • Catalogue Capital@Art. Int.
    • Artists and curator
    • Preface
    • From Political Critique to Spiritual Embrace
    • Perception is Reality
    • Operation Thanatos in Action
    • At Least the Pain is Real
    • Money Is Time
    • Feelings As Facts
  • CONTACT
  • 关于庸现
  • 展览
    • 秃头戈女- 北京伊比利亚
    • 秃头戈女 - 一个门
    • 中国制造
    • 社会雕塑 - 博伊斯在中国
    • 秃头戈女- 时差
    • 红颜女强 –从杨贵妃到“秃头戈女”
    • 油烟才女 - 秃头戈女 遇见激浪
    • 秃头戈女- 桃色策略
    • 秃头戈女- 南京论坛
    • 激浪时间
    • 排斥
    • 2015威斯巴登行为艺术节
    • 2016威斯巴登行为艺术节
    • 2017威斯巴登行为艺术节
    • 第三届现场艺术巡展參展: 谁要同去卡塞尔?
    • 女权行动在中国:与李麦子的对话
    • 2018 天津现场艺术创作邀请展
    • 2018 我都看过了
    • 2018法兰克福行为艺术节
    • 资本@艺术. 国际 2018
    • 感受即真实 -记忆与身份认同 2018-19
    • "景观”国际艺术交流展2019
    • 第7届Up-On 向上国际现场艺术节2019
    • 0界 移位 欧洲篇上
    • 共享的危机 2020
  • 文章
    • 共享的危机
    • 记忆与身份认同
    • 谁是玛丽·包麦斯特 (艺术国际版)
    • 信息资本主义时代的博伊斯
    • 秃头戈女 - 和吴味谈男权视野的局限
    • 访谈包麦斯特
    • 托尼•克拉格
    • 庸现与李勇政、 周斌对话。
    • 关于“西方主义”
    • 从 清洗 谈肖鲁对 颠覆 之 再颠覆_
    • 重要的不是秃头-再次回应吴味
    • 驳徐乔斯
    • 严肃的游戏: 对话李勇政
  • 媒体报道
    • 中国来鸿 纽约时报 狄狄
    • 凤凰艺术 : 策展人篇
    • 与画刊谈《博伊斯在中国》
    • 答复新京报记者李健亚
    • 《山花》杂志 2012 10月号访谈
  • 出版
    • 艺术家& 策展人简介
    • 《资本 @ 艺术· 国际》 >
      • 数字时代的资本@艺术
      • 从政治批判到精神拥抱
      • 直觉就是现实
      • “托斯”在行动
      • 至少疼痛还是真实的
      • 感受即真实
      • 金钱就是时间
    • 秃头戈女画册 >
      • 作者译者简介
      • 秃头女性艺术宣言
      • 秃头戈女序
      • 李心沫:一个中国批判现实主义艺术的先锋艺术家
      • 重释肖鲁
      • 艺术视觉与真诚 蓝镜
      • 女性身体艺术的承担与实践
      • 女性身体艺术的承担与实践
      • 中国玻璃眼球 中文版
      • 东西方女权运动的思考
      • 中国女权运动与女性艺术发展历程
  • 联系
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • PROJECTS
    • Bald Girls Iberia Center 2012
    • Bald Girls A Door 2013
    • Made in China 2013
    • Beuys in China 2013
    • Bald Girls Timelag 2013
    • Femme Totale 2014
    • Bald Girls meet Fluxus 2014
    • Bald Girls Pink Solution 2014
    • Bald Girls Nanjing Forum 2014
    • Fluxus Nanjing 2014
    • Li Xinmo Excluded 2015
    • Performance Day 2015
    • Performance Day 2016
    • Performance Day 2017
    • Art Tour Live Tour 3 / Join us to Kassel 2017
    • Feminist Activism in China: In Conversation with Li Maizi 2017
    • Tianjin Live Art Exhibition 2018
    • Denn ich habe schon alles schon gesehen Frankfurt 2018
    • Performance Day Frankfurt 2018
    • Capital @Art. International Frankfurt 2018
    • Feelings as Facts - Memory as Identity Tianjin China 2018-2019
    • Spectacle International Art Exchange Jiangxi China 2019
    • The 7th UP-ON International Live Art Festival 2019
    • 0 Edge Shift Europe A 2020
    • Sharing Crisis 2020
  • ARTICLES
    • Sharing Crisis
    • A Very Serious Game
    • Bald Girls
    • Who is Mary Bauermeister?
    • Iberia Art Center
    • Time Travel to Fluxus
    • Memory as Iidentity
    • We are the Revolution
    • Capital in the Digital Age @ Art
    • Money Is Time
    • Operation Thanatos in Action
    • Memory as Identity
    • From Political Critique to Spiritual Embrace
    • Perception is Reality
    • At Least the Pain is Real
  • PRESS
    • New York Times
    • F.A.Z.
    • Global Times
    • ML Art Source
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • Catalogue Bald Girls
    • Introduction
    • Declaration
    • Preface
    • Li Xinmo
    • Xiao Lu
    • Lan Jiny
    • Female Performance Art
    • History of Feminism
    • Feminist Movement and Feminist Art in East and West
  • Catalogue Capital@Art. Int.
    • Artists and curator
    • Preface
    • From Political Critique to Spiritual Embrace
    • Perception is Reality
    • Operation Thanatos in Action
    • At Least the Pain is Real
    • Money Is Time
    • Feelings As Facts
  • CONTACT
  • 关于庸现
  • 展览
    • 秃头戈女- 北京伊比利亚
    • 秃头戈女 - 一个门
    • 中国制造
    • 社会雕塑 - 博伊斯在中国
    • 秃头戈女- 时差
    • 红颜女强 –从杨贵妃到“秃头戈女”
    • 油烟才女 - 秃头戈女 遇见激浪
    • 秃头戈女- 桃色策略
    • 秃头戈女- 南京论坛
    • 激浪时间
    • 排斥
    • 2015威斯巴登行为艺术节
    • 2016威斯巴登行为艺术节
    • 2017威斯巴登行为艺术节
    • 第三届现场艺术巡展參展: 谁要同去卡塞尔?
    • 女权行动在中国:与李麦子的对话
    • 2018 天津现场艺术创作邀请展
    • 2018 我都看过了
    • 2018法兰克福行为艺术节
    • 资本@艺术. 国际 2018
    • 感受即真实 -记忆与身份认同 2018-19
    • "景观”国际艺术交流展2019
    • 第7届Up-On 向上国际现场艺术节2019
    • 0界 移位 欧洲篇上
    • 共享的危机 2020
  • 文章
    • 共享的危机
    • 记忆与身份认同
    • 谁是玛丽·包麦斯特 (艺术国际版)
    • 信息资本主义时代的博伊斯
    • 秃头戈女 - 和吴味谈男权视野的局限
    • 访谈包麦斯特
    • 托尼•克拉格
    • 庸现与李勇政、 周斌对话。
    • 关于“西方主义”
    • 从 清洗 谈肖鲁对 颠覆 之 再颠覆_
    • 重要的不是秃头-再次回应吴味
    • 驳徐乔斯
    • 严肃的游戏: 对话李勇政
  • 媒体报道
    • 中国来鸿 纽约时报 狄狄
    • 凤凰艺术 : 策展人篇
    • 与画刊谈《博伊斯在中国》
    • 答复新京报记者李健亚
    • 《山花》杂志 2012 10月号访谈
  • 出版
    • 艺术家& 策展人简介
    • 《资本 @ 艺术· 国际》 >
      • 数字时代的资本@艺术
      • 从政治批判到精神拥抱
      • 直觉就是现实
      • “托斯”在行动
      • 至少疼痛还是真实的
      • 感受即真实
      • 金钱就是时间
    • 秃头戈女画册 >
      • 作者译者简介
      • 秃头女性艺术宣言
      • 秃头戈女序
      • 李心沫:一个中国批判现实主义艺术的先锋艺术家
      • 重释肖鲁
      • 艺术视觉与真诚 蓝镜
      • 女性身体艺术的承担与实践
      • 女性身体艺术的承担与实践
      • 中国玻璃眼球 中文版
      • 东西方女权运动的思考
      • 中国女权运动与女性艺术发展历程
  • 联系

TIME TRAVEL TO FLUXUS

There is no doubt that nowadays “Fluxus” as a noun referring to an important event in the art history of the 20th century is attached with a label of the past. It represents a kind of old-school vanguard of anti-art.

In fact, after a long time, Fluxus has also been included in the history of art and become a classic term in art. This can be seen as a paradox resulting from a prototype alienated through the passing of time.

But after all, the birth of Fluxus stirred up genuine excitement in its time when the revolution of artistic views illuminated various forms of performance art. These performances accumulated to change the essence of meaning and ignite a series of events which were recorded by the emerging video media. As a result, performances, events and media constitute the art of “Fluxus”. Now after the past of half a century, as the magnetic head rubs the old magnetic tracks, the linguistic codes of the past are deciphered, and on the dark screen of history flash those mythological names – George Maciunas, John Cage, Joseph Beuys, Nam June Paik, Yoko Ono, Joe Jonas and Ben Patterson. With rebellious ideas and disobedient behaviors, they ended up modern art in the industrial age and opened a door towards post-modern art. Through the door we know that noises may be sacred, and video is even philosophical.

In the past thirty years which has witnessed the birth, development, downturn, transformation and death of Chinese modern art, “Fluxus” has not been a word mentioned frequently. It did not influence Chinese modern art as a whole combined of language and artistic views. On the contrary, the revolution of ideas and experiments of language in “Fluxus” gradually made their way into China with only fragments and broken pieces. Chinese modern artists got their initial perceptual knowledge about Fluxus from a fat chair by Joseph Beuys, a video image by Nam June Paik, or the explanation of what silence means in 4’33’’ in a chapter of a book about art history. They never had a comprehensive understanding of Fluxus, and seldom talked about it correctly. In Chinese modern art, “Fluxus” is similar to a veiled shadow of history, which is present everywhere at every moment yet still remains somewhat silent.

Fluxus, as a temporal point in the history and a remarkable milestone in the art history, is destined to be repeatedly interpreted by later generations, and interpretations will be different from each other in different historical and cultural contexts. Such differences are sure to induce doubts and questions about the art history of different time and in different regions so that people can make amendments and complements to their art history from new perspectives. The whole process is indeed time travelling with the spirit of scientific fiction – to go backward to a moment in the history from the present.

 
By Cao Kai